The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD LYNN GARDNER JR. ____________ Appeal 2006-2462 Application 09/790,856 Technology Center 2600 ____________ Decided: February 6, 2007 ____________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, and ALLEN R. MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134, Appellant has appealed to the Board from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 through 15, 18 through 21, 30 through 33, 36 and 52 through 57. Pages 2 and 3 of the Answer indicate that the Examiner has withdrawn the rejection as to certain other claims originally on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013