Appeal 2006-2504 Application 09/422,998 Appellants argue that claim 14 is patentable over the prior art of record for the same reasons that independent claim 13 is allegedly patentable. Accordingly, we will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 14 as being unpatentable over Wookey in view of Sybase for the same reasons discussed supra with respect to independent claim 13, and also for the same reasons discussed supra with respect to independent claim 7. DECISION In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s rejection of all claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-5, 7- 14, 16-18, and 20-22 is affirmed. In the event prosecution is reopened in this application, we direct the Examiner’s attention to U.S. Pat. 5,809,238 to Greenblatt. Greenblatt discloses a system directed to data processing techniques for collecting and managing data such as techniques for monitoring the performance of computer networks, and in particular to database techniques, such as relational databases including those using SQL engines, for collecting and managing data in a network. In particular, Greenblatt discloses monitoring and comparing performance data from computers in a network. 13Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013