The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JOHN F. ACKERMAN,
ANDREW J. SKOOG, MATTHEW B. BUCZEK,
and JANE ANN MURPHY
______________
Appeal 2006-2523
Application 10/206,496
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: January 30, 2007
_______________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to this Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 20, all of the claims in the
Application. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013