The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte SIEGFRIED FICHTNER, JURGEN HOFMANN,
KARL MUSSIG, AND DANIEL VERHOEVEN
________________
Appeal 2006-2534
Application 10/789,411
Technology Center 2800
________________
Decided: August 9, 2007
________________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY,
MAHSHID D. SAADAT, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and
JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request reconsideration of our Decision of
January 31, 2007, wherein we sustained the Examiner’s rejection of the
appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
We have carefully considered the arguments presented by Appellants
in the Request and reviewed our decision. However, those arguments do not
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013