The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BRETT HATCH, BURTON HATCH, and
BARLOW HATCH
____________
Appeal 2006-2547
Application 10/095,4091
Patent 6,237,775
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: May 31, 2007
____________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL, and
JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
2 Examiner's final rejection of all the claims pending in this reissue
1 Application 10/095,409 was filed March 11, 2002 as a reissue of U.S.
Patent 6,237,775 issued May 29, 2001, based on application 09/563,375,
filed May 3, 2000, and assigned to T3B, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013