The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD L. GULDI
____________
Appeal 2006-2564
Application 10/259,743
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: February 22, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final
rejection of claims 13 through 15 and 17 through 19. Claim 16, the
remaining claim pending in the above-identified application, stands
withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as being directed to a non-
elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013