Ex Parte Petersen - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                         Ex parte CYLE D. PETERSEN                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal 2006-2599                                                    
                                             Application 10/199,986                                                 
                                            Technology Center 2800                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                           Decided: February 27, 2007                                               
                                                  ____________                                                      

                 Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, and                                                   
                 ALLEN R. MACDONALD,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134, Appellant has appealed to the Board                             
                 from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1 through 18.                                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013