Appeal 2006-2603
Application 10/270,486
process with the reasonable expectation that such compensation would
maximize the efficiency of the process, whether or not Appellants' particular
advantage of thickness uniformity was projected. As noted in our Decision,
Appellants have proffered no objective evidence which demonstrates that
effecting voltage compensation in the claimed anodization process produces
a uniformity in thickness that would have been unexpected to one of
ordinary skill in the art.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, we have granted Appellants'
request to the extent we have reconsidered our decision, but we deny the
request to make any change therein.
DENIED
cam
Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, LLP
1990 M Street, N.W., Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036-3425
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3
Last modified: September 9, 2013