Ex Parte Ashraf et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                        Ex parte ARMAN ASHRAF and                                                   
                                                   YAN ZHAO                                                         
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal 2006-2614                                                    
                                             Application 10/610,605                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                            Decided:  March 12, 2007                                                
                                                  ____________                                                      

                 Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and PETER F. KRATZ,                                          
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                      
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final                            
                 rejection of claims 1-25.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6                          
                 (2006).                                                                                            








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013