The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARMAN ASHRAF and
YAN ZHAO
____________
Appeal 2006-2614
Application 10/610,605
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 12, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and PETER F. KRATZ,
Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-25. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6
(2006).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013