The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSHUA M. KOPELMAN, CHRISTOPHER D. FRALIC,
and SRINIVAS BALIJEPALLI
____________
Appeal 2006-2635
Application 09/935,287
Technology Center 3600
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Kopelman, Fralic, and Balijepalli (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 13 and 21
through 32, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a computer-implemented method for
listing goods for sale on a website by receiving from the seller product
information in the form of a series of tones generated on a touch tone
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013