Appeal 2006-2644 Application 10/047,945 more than the LT-10 embodiment encompassed by the claims, we do not rely on the lack of evidence pertaining to peptides having less than ten amino acids. SUMMARY We modify the previous opinion by (1) withdrawing our reliance on the second full paragraph on page 6, and (2) acknowledging that footnote 2 is in error (and considering Fig. 1). Notwithstanding those modifications, however, we conclude that the instant claims are not enabled by the Specification’s disclosure because the evidence of record does not show that administration of LT-10 reduces the level of IgE (as opposed to masking it from anti-IgE binding) or that the measured saliva levels of IgE correspond to the “serum IgE” levels recited in the claims. REHEARING DENIED dm John R. Casperson PO Box 2174 Friendswood TX 77549 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013