The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FRANKLIN E. PARKS,
DEBKUMAR BHATTACHARJEE,
and THELMA SANCHEZ
__________
Appeal 2006-2662
Application 09/928,764
Technology Center 1700
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims to an aqueous polyurethane dispersion, a
polyurethane film, and a process of making a polyurethane film. The
Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated or obvious. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The specification describes a polyurethane dispersion prepared by
forming a non-ionic polyurethane prepolymer and dispersing the prepolymer
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013