Appeal 2006-2673 Application 10/004,192 CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing, we reverse the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of claims 1, 10, and 11, as well as the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 2-9 and 12-20. A new rejection of claims 1 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is entered pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b). 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) provides A[a] new ground of rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review. 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) also provides that the Appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims: (1) Reopen prosecution. Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner.... (2) Request rehearing. Request that the proceeding be reheard under § 41.52 by the Board upon the same record.... No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013