The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JOZEF VERBORGT and ARTHUR A. WEBB __________ Appeal No. 2006-2677 Application No. 10/346,099 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to a thermoset and a process for making a thermoset. The examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated or obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We reverse. Background The specification describes a process of making a thermoset comprising reacting a polyol monomer with a polyisocyanate. Page 2. An isocyanate is represented by the general formula R-N=C=O. See the encyclopedia entry for isocyanate included in the Evidence Appendix. The polyol monomer has the following formula:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013