Appeal 2006-2678
Application 09/235,120
1 DISCUSSION
2 We agree with the Appellants that Conway does not teach or suggest
3 creating a unique source cost identifier data structure for each collected
4 actual cost and associating a unique source cost identifier data structure for
5 each step carried out while manufacturing the item or while performing the
6 service. In addition, we have found that neither Bone nor Fahey cure this
7 deficiency of Conway. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner’s
8 rejection of claims 1 to 7, 9 to 12 and 14 to 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) .
9
10 DECISION
11 The decision of the Examiner is reversed.
12
13 REVERSED
14
15
16
17 vsh
18
19
20
21 YOUNG LAW FIRM, P.C.
22 4370 ALPINE RD.
23 STE. 106
24 PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013