1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
2 and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte DAVID A. RUSSO, RYAN R. DIRKX
12 and GLENN P. FLORCZAK
13 ____________________
14
15 Appeal 2006-2684
16 Reissue Application 08/544,212
17 Patent 5,401,305
18 Technology Center 1700
19 ____________________
20
21 Appeal 2006-2747
22 Reissue Application 09/287,664
23 Patent 5,401,305
24 Technology Center 1700
25 ____________________
26
27 Oral Argument: None1
28 Decided: February 8, 2007
29 ____________________
30
31 Before: BRADLEY R. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge,
32 FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
33 ALLEN R. MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.
34
35 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
36
37
38 DECISION ON APPEALS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
1 Oral argument was requested in both appeals, but has been waived.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013