Ex Parte Feil et al - Page 1





                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board                                         
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                               _______________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                               _______________                                                     
                                              Ex parte HANS FEIL                                                   
                               and MARTINUS JACOBUS JOHANNES HACK                                                  
                                                ______________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2692                                                    
                                            Application 10/480,360                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                               _______________                                                     
                                         Decided: September 10, 2007                                               
                                               _______________                                                     
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                    
                PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
                WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary                             
                Examiner finally rejecting for at least the second time claims 1 through 20 in                     
                the Office Action mailed November 25, 2005.  35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a)                             
                (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).                                                               
                       We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.                                            



                                                        1                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013