Appeal No. 2006-2700 Application No. 10/705,456 service functions wherein said function-specific parameters are associated with one of said generic executable service functions; and a response generating module for generating a function- specific response from one of said generic executable service functions, wherein said function-specific response is associated with one of said generic executable service functions and includes said device information. References The Examiner relies on the following references: Jones et al. (Jones) 6,216,173 Apr. 10, 2001 Wray 2001/0010076 Jul. 26, 2001 Shapiro et al. (Shapiro) 2002/0120787 Aug. 29, 2002 Fischer et al. (Fischer) 2003/0046448 Mar. 6, 2003 (Filed June 5, 2002) Wookey et al. (Wookey) 2003/0177259 Sep. 18, 2003 (Filed Feb. 4, 2002) Rejections at Issue A. Claims 3, 4, 6 through 8, 10 through 12, and 14 through 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Shapiro, Fisher, and Jones. B. Claims 5, 9, and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Shapiro, Fisher, Jones, Wookey, and Wray. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013