1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte JOHN M. WHITE and AKIHIRO HOSOKAWA
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2006-2725
16 Application No. 09/982,406
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: June 29, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and STUART S. LEVY,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 8, 14, 15, 17-21 and 47-52,
31 which are all of the pending claims.
32 THE INVENTION
33 The Appellants claim an apparatus for supporting a substrate in a chamber.
34 Claim 8 is illustrative:
35
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013