The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JASNA ROETH and MANFRED BARTEL ____________ Appeal 2006-2726 Application 10/213,507 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: March 6, 2007 ____________ Before ALLEN R. MACDONALD, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) the Examiner’s rejection of claims 10-13, 15-19, 21-24, and 26-30, the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013