The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARCEL JOHAN EIJSACKERS,
BERNARD KLEINE, KATJA PETER,
AND WERNER WITTKE
____________
Appeal 2006-2751
Application 10/205,090
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: June 13, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON,
and JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants have requested a rehearing of our decision dated
November 20, 2006, wherein we affirmed the obviousness rejection of claim
1 based on the teachings of Miura considered alone, and affirmed the
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013