Appeal 2006-2764 Application 10/376,830 In light of this definition, one of ordinary skill in this art would not interpret the claim language under consideration as reading on or encompassing the electrode arrangement of Urry as described by the Examiner in the Answer. This is because the definition requires that each inner electrode is radially completely surrounded by the electrode immediately outside of it. The first and second electrodes of Urry, as identified by the Examiner, are not so disposed. Therefore, we can not sustain the Examiner's § 102 rejection as being anticipated by Urry. We also can not sustain the § 103 rejections since the additionally applied references are not relied upon by the Examiner as supplying the above discussed deficiencies of Urry. The decision of the Examiner is reversed. cam MICHAEL C. POPHAL EVEREADY BATTERY CO., INC. 25225 DETROIT ROAD P. O. BOX 450777 WESTLAKE, OH 44145 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4
Last modified: September 9, 2013