Appeal No. 2006-2765
Application No. 10/372,160
result. Thus, the obviousness rejection of claims 1 through 5, 7 through 9,
11 and 28 through 30 is sustained.
Turning lastly to the obviousness rejections of claims 6, 10, 16, 19
and 25, we hereby sustain these rejections because of the lack of any
patentability arguments for these claims in the main brief.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 11 and 28
through 30 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is affirmed. The
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 30 under the first
paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed. The decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 1 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is affirmed. The
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 12 through 15, 17, 18 and 20
through 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed, and the decision of the
examiner rejecting claims 1 through 11, 16, 19, 25 and 28 through 30 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013