The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARTHUR WONG
and SAEED FERESHTEHKHOU
____________
Appeal 2006-2791
Application 09/729,626
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 14, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, 11-18, 21-25, 31-34, 37,
38, and 47-72, which are the only claims pending in this application. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a disposable
macroscopically three-dimensional non-apertured cleaning sheet for
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013