Appeal 2006-2849
Application 10/310,200
We therefore are not convinced of reversible error in the Examiner’s
rejection.3
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Fox in view
of Reilly is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
HAHN LOESER & PARKS, LLP
One GOJO Plaza
Suite 300
AKRON, OH 44311-1076
3 In the event of further prosecution the Examiner and the Appellant should
address whether there is adequate antecedent basis for “the radial surface” in
claim 8.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013