Ex Parte Takeda - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                      Ex parte KAZUHIRO TAKEDA                                                
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2853                                                 
                                           Application 10/145,933                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: March 23, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and LINDA E. HORNER,                                   
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                 
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1-42, which are all                    
                of the pending claims.  In the Examiner’s Answer the rejection is withdrawn                   
                as to claims 7-9, 11, 12, 14-21, 26-33 and 35-42 (Answer 2).                                  
                                             THE INVENTION                                                    
                      The Appellant claims an apparatus for determining when to shift a                       
                bicycle chain from one sprocket to another.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013