Ex Parte Bussey et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2859                                                                                   
                Application 11/062,725                                                                             

            1   deformable membrane is deformable in three dimensions to envelop an item                           
            2   of three-dimensional shape (Specification 2).                                                      
            3          Claim 1 under appeal reads as follows:                                                      
            4                 1. A package module for an item of three-dimensional                                 
            5                 shape comprising                                                                     
            6                        a porous deformable membrane defining an enclosed                             
            7                 space and characterized in being deformable in three                                 
            8                 dimensions to envelop the item of three-dimensional shape                            
            9                 therein; and                                                                         
          10                         a mass of loose fill elements disposed within said                            
          11                  membrane and occupying an amount of said space sufficient to                         
          12                  permit said membrane to be shaped about the item of three                            
          13                  dimensional shape and to permit said elements to move within                         
          14                  said membrane to accommodate the three-dimensional shape of                          
          15                  the item and to envelop the item therein.                                            
          16                                                                                                       
          17           The Examiner rejected claims 1 to 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11 under 35                           
          18    U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Tate.                                                      
          19           The Examiner rejected claims 1 to 3, 5 to 8, 10, and 11 under 35                            
          20    U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Alivizatos.                                                
          21           The Examiner rejected claims 1, 2, and 5 to 10 under 35 U.S.C.                              
          22    § 102(b) as being anticipated by Olesen.                                                           
          23           The Examiner rejected claims 1, 3 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                         
          24    being anticipated by Groth.                                                                        
          25           The Examiner rejected claims 1, 4, 5, and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                        
          26    as being anticipated by Fuss.                                                                      

                                                        2                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013