The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TADASHI TAKANO
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2872
Application No. 10/248,928
Technology Center 3700
____________
HEARD: December 12, 2006
____________
Before BAHR, NAPPI and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-4 and
8-11. Claims 5-7 and 12-14, the only other claims remaining in the application,
stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but are otherwise
indicated as allowable.
We REVERSE.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013