Appeal 2006-2882 Application 10/433,729 INTRODUCTION Appellants invented a method for producing a steel hot strip having a manganese content of more than 12 and up to 30 weight percent comprising the following steps: (1) forming a roughed strip by casting a melt in a double-roller casting machine, and (2) immediately after casting and without reheating the roughed strip, hot-rolling the roughed strip in a single hot roll pass through the a roll stand to the final thickness of the strip (Specification 1-2). By hot rolling immediately after casting, Appellants avoid reheating the roughed strip that is required by conventional methods (Specification 3). Claim 12 is illustrative: 12. A method for producing a steel hot strip with TWIP and TRIP characteristics from a steel which comprises more than 12 weight % and up to 30 weight % of manganese, comprising casting a melt in a double-roller casting machine so as to form a roughed strip at close to the final dimensions of said hot strip, said roughed strip having a thickness of up to 6 mm, immediately after said casting step and without reheating said roughed strip, continuously processing said roughed strip by being hot rolled in a roll stand in a single hot roll pass to the final thickness of the hot strip. The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence of unpatentability: Suzuki (as translated) JP 57-025950 Aug. 27, 1983 Guelton US 6,358,338 B1 Mar. 19, 2002 The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows: 1. Claims 12-14 and 18-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as unpatentable over Guelton. 2. Claims 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Guelton in view of Suzuki. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013