Ex Parte Yeung et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                                       Ex parte HUBERT K. YEUNG,                                                
                                           MICHAEL T. POWERS,                                                   
                                       AND WESLEY C. WHITELEY                                                   
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2006-2910                                                  
                                           Application 10/226,586                                               
                                           Technology Center 2800                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                           Decided: April 18, 2007                                              
                                                ____________                                                    

                Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,                                              
                and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                           
                Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1, 4, 8-18, 20-23, 27-36, 38, 39, and                      
                41.  Claims 2, 3, 25, and 26 have been canceled and claims 5-7, 19, 24, 37,                     
                40, and 42 have been withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a                           
                non-elected invention.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013