The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HUBERT K. YEUNG,
MICHAEL T. POWERS,
AND WESLEY C. WHITELEY
____________
Appeal 2006-2910
Application 10/226,586
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: April 18, 2007
____________
Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1, 4, 8-18, 20-23, 27-36, 38, 39, and
41. Claims 2, 3, 25, and 26 have been canceled and claims 5-7, 19, 24, 37,
40, and 42 have been withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to a
non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013