Appeal 2006-2932 Application 10/042,192 predominant language by the additional use of n-gram probability data. Page 4 of the Reply Brief does not reargue against the Examiner’s positions with respect to this second rejection of the claims on appeal. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting all claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §103 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED PGC Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP P.O. Box 10500 McLean, VA 22102 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013