Appeal 2006-2961 Application 09/745,390 We will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of representative claim 1. In our view, the scope and breadth of the term “self-powered” does not preclude devices that are powered solely by batteries, such as the battery- powered information entry part of Halperin. Moreover, we agree with the Examiner that this teaching would have been reasonably combinable with detachable keyboard of Park. Park discloses a portable communications terminal with a main housing 10 and a foldable, detachable keyboard 30 that communicate with each other wirelessly (Park, col. 3, ll. 39-46, 57-67; col. 4, ll. 32-52; Fig. 3). Halperin discloses a handset 10 with a detachable keypad 16 that wirelessly communicates with the handset via RF transmitter E1. The keypad is powered by battery B1 that is preferably a lithium, thin film battery (Halperin, col. 2, ll. 35-42; 61-63; col. 4, ll. 13-18; Fig. 1). That Halperin’s keypad uses a battery to generate power within the keypad hardly means that the keypad is not “self-powered” giving the term its broadest reasonable interpretation.2 As the Examiner indicates, a battery- powered device is capable of operating independently of any other power source. Notwithstanding the fact that a battery is used, electric power is nonetheless generated within the device itself. That is, the battery is an internal component of the device that generates power to operate the device.3 2 In fact, wireless keyboards with internal batteries have been touted as “self- powered” keyboards. See, e.g., Palm Wireless Keyboard for Treo 650, 700p, 600, at http://software.palminfocenter.com/productAccessories.asp?id=4311 (wireless keyboard featured as “self-powered” with an internal battery lasting up to four months). 3 Even other forms of self-powered devices (e.g., devices generating power via solar or mechanical means) are dependent on an “outside agency” to 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013