Ex Parte Epitaux et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                 Ex parte MARC EPITAUX, WILFRIED NOELL, YVES PETREMAND,                                      
                                      and NICOLAAS-F DE ROOIJ                                                
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2006-2967                                                
                                          Application 10/832,598                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided:  March 13, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ALLEN R. MACDONALD,                                               
                and JEAN R. HOMERE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1                      
                through 26, 28 and 29 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We have jurisdiction                     
                under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013