Ex Parte Almog - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Ex parte YAACOV ALMOG                                                 
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2006-2968                                                
                                          Application 10/039,481                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  May 15, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and CATHERINE Q.                                   
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      We AFFIRM.                                                                             
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We have                        
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                                            
                      The Appellant invented a method for preparing a liquid toner for                       
                electrostatic development of electrostatic images.  The method involves                      
                coating pigmented polymer particles with an ionomer whereupon the                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013