The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KLAUS BRECHT and PETER HAAS
____________
Appeal 2006-2980
Application 10/683,240
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 6, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1-3. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Appellants’ invention relates to cellular amine-crosslinked
polyurethane elastomers. The cellular elastomers of the present invention
are useful for soles of shoes and exhibit very good low temperature
properties and heat resistance up to 160°C (Specification 5-6).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013