Ex Parte Lu et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
               Ex parte HARRY H. LU, THOMAS E. MANLEY, and JOSEPH J. HARDING                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2985                                                   
                                            Application 10/702,225                                                
                                            Technology Center 3700                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                          Decided:  February 12, 2007                                             
                                                 ____________                                                     
             Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ROBERT E. NAPPI and LINDA E.                                             
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 


                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                     
                    The Appellants seek our review of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims                    
             1, 3-9, and 23.  We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 USC § 134(a).                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013