The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JES ASMUSSEN and WEN SHIN HUANG
____________
Appeal 2006-2992
Application 10/073,710
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: January 30, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 8 through 19, which are the only claims
pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a process for
depositing a nanocrystalline diamond film with a grain size between 1 and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013