Ex Parte Taylor et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2997                                                                                  
                Application 09/881,911                                                                            

                rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 18, 20 through 35, which are all of the                       
                claims pending in this application.                                                               
                       Appellants' invention relates to a method, in a network-based auction,                     
                for pre-approving a bidder or buyer for a particular sale listing.  Claim 1 is                    
                illustrative of the claimed invention and reads as follows:                                       
                1.     A method to pre-approve a bidder for network-based shopping, the                           
                method including:                                                                                 
                       receiving an authorization communication, over a network, at a                             
                              network-based auction facility, the authorization                                   
                              communication to authorize the bidder to bid on a particular                        
                              sale listing that is listed for sale by a seller; and                               
                       at the network-based auction facility, automatically recording the                         
                              bidder as authorized to bid on the particular sale listing                          
                              responsive to the authorization communication.                                      
                       The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in                          
                rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                
                Walker                   US 6,240,396 B1                     May 29, 2001                         
                Stewart                  US 2001/0049634 A1                  Dec. 06, 2001                        
                                                          (effectively filed Mar. 06, 2000)                       
                Kumar                    US 2002/0042755 A1                  Apr. 11, 2002                        
                                                          (effectively filed Oct. 05, 2000)                       
                Friedland                US 2002/0174060 A1                  Nov. 21, 2002                        
                                                         (effectively filed Dec. 30, 1998)                       
                       Claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13 through 18, and 20 through 35 stand                          
                rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Stewart1.                               


                                                                                                                 
                1 The Examiner included claims 3 and 19 in this rejection (Answer 4), but                         
                those claims have been cancelled.                                                                 

                                                        2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013