Ex Parte Bobrow et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                  __________                                                      
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  __________                                                      
                    Ex parte MARK NORMAN BOBROW, and KARL EDWIN ADLER                                             
                                                  __________                                                      
                                             Appeal No. 2006-3006                                                 
                                          Application No. 10/123,713                                              
                                                  __________                                                      
                                         HEARD: December 13, 2006                                                 
                                                  __________                                                      
             Before SCHEINER, ADAMS, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
             LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This appeal involves claims to an analytical system comprising an array of                    
             different first members of a specific binding pair.  The Examiner has rejected the                   
             claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We affirm.                           










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013