The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RICHARD E. HUBER __________ Appeal No. 2006-3016 Application No. 10/212,240 __________ HEARD: December 12, 2006 __________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-24, which are all of the claims pending in this application. The Examiner indicates claims 7-10 and 18-20 as allowable (Answer 2), which leaves only the rejection of claims 1-6, 11- 17 and 21-24 to be considered by this panel. We affirm.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013