Ex Parte Huber - Page 1

                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                  __________                                                      
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  __________                                                      
                                        Ex parte RICHARD E. HUBER                                                 
                                                  __________                                                      
                                             Appeal No. 2006-3016                                                 
                                          Application No. 10/212,240                                              
                                                  __________                                                      
                                         HEARD: December 12, 2006                                                 
                                                  __________                                                      
                Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                             
                Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-24, which are all of the claims                            
                pending in this application.  The Examiner indicates claims 7-10 and 18-20                        
                as allowable (Answer 2), which leaves only the rejection of claims 1-6, 11-                       
                17 and 21-24 to be considered by this panel.                                                      
                       We affirm.                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013