Ex Parte Peppel - Page 7


        Appeal No. 2006-3019                                            
        Application No. 09/735,586                                      
        prior to December 7, 1994 coupled with due diligence in         
        the reduction to practice continuing to the date of             
        filing of the application.                                      
            The current application is a continuation of U.S.           
        application number 08/398,862 filed on March 6, 1995.           
        The ‘862 application matured into U.S. Patent No.               
        6,200,216, dated March 13, 2001.  In the Office Action          
        of February 3, 2003, the Examiner in the instant                
        application rejected the claims under the judicially            
        created doctrine of non-statutory double patenting.  A          
        terminal disclaimer was filed on August 12, 2003.               
            The Examiner has raised three issues with respect           
        to the Appellant’s declaration under § 1.131: First, it         
        is not specific to the application at hand; Second,             
        there is insufficient evidence of conception to support         
        the limitations of the claims; and Third, the                   
        declaration does not present sufficient evidence of             
        due diligence over the required period.                         

                                   7                                    


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013