The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CLEMENS JUNG, PETER SCHWARZWELLER,
KONRAD PETRY, and REINHOLD BALTES
____________
Appeal 2006-3025
Application 10/714,110
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 29, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 2, 8-
10, and 12-20, the only claims pending in this application. We have
jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellants’ invention relates to a method of cleaning dishes. The
necessary cleaning temperature and length of cleaning operation are derived
from the turbidity of the rinsing liquid and solubility of the soiling of the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013