Appeal 2007-3048 Application 10/355,018 Thus, based on the totality of record, including due consideration of the Appellants’ arguments, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs most heavily in favor of obviousness within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, for the factual findings set forth in the Answer and above, we affirm the Examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103. V. ORDER The decision of the Examiner is affirmed. VI. TIME PERIOD FOR RESPONSE No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED clj Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. 1940 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013