1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte ADRIAN B. CHERNOFF and
12 TOMMY E. WHITE
13
14 Appeal 2006-3057
15 Application 10/426,9051
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: March 30, 2007
20
21 Before: ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W.
22 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
23
24 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
25
26
27 DECISION ON APPEAL
28
29 STATEMENT OF CASE
30 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
31 of claims 1-17 and 31. Claims 18-30 have been withdrawn from
32 consideration (Br. 2). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
33 Appellants invented a vehicle door having a unitary inner and outer
34 panel (Specification 1). The vehicle door comprises a unitary, one-piece
1 Application filed April 29, 2003. The real party in interest is General
Motors Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013