The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HALL VIRGIL JR., MERLE D. SEARS, and MICHAEL L. BROWN ____________ Appeal 2006-3059 Application 10/293,725 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: May 14, 2007 ____________ Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Hall Virgil Jr. et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-3, 6, and 7, the only pending claims. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2002).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013