The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT R. KREBS, MICHAEL E. INGRIM,
ERNEST L. PHELPS, VIRGIL B. CANADY,
and BILLY JOE BILLECK JR.
____________
Appeal 2006-3060
Application 09/683,735
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 31, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
We remand the application to the Examiner for consideration and
explanation of issues raised by the record. 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.35(b) and
41.50(a)(1) (2006). In particular, we remand this application to the
Examiner for obtaining clarification of the record as to the appeal status of
all of the pending claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013