Appeal No. 2006-3062
Application No. 09/861,153
retrieving a corresponding address format by looking up a portion of
said parsed address in an index table, the corresponding address format defining
required placement of address elements within a shipping address; and
generating a formatted shipping address by converting said parsed address
into said corresponding address format.
The references relied on by the Examiner as evidence of unpatentability are:
Ramanathan US 2002/0083371 A1 June 27, 2002
(filed Dec. 27, 2000)
Ulvr US 6,415,983 July 9, 2002
(filed Feb. 26, 1999)
Yu US 2002/0153409 A1 Oct. 24, 2002
(filed Feb. 16, 2001)
Harman US 6,658,430 Dec. 2, 2003
(filed Dec. 23, 1999)
Address Control & ZipData-US, Hallogram Publishing,
http://hallogram.com/addresscomponents/, 2000, pages 1-3.
Claims 1, 2, 9 through 13, 20 through 25, 28, 29 and 36 through 38 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Yu in view of
Harman.
Claims 4 through 8, 15 through 19 and 31 through 35 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Yu in view of Harman and the
Hallogram publication.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013