The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte VIJAYESHWAR D. KHANNA and SRI M. SRI-JAYANTHA __________ Appeal 2006-3069 Application 10/661,273 Technology Center 2600 __________ Decided: September 27, 2007 _________ Before JOHN C. MARTIN, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges. COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3-7, 9-15, and 17-22. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013