Ex Parte Khanna et al - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                                                                                  

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                  __________                                                       
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  __________                                                       
                                 Ex parte VIJAYESHWAR D. KHANNA and                                                
                                           SRI M. SRI-JAYANTHA                                                     
                                                  __________                                                       
                                               Appeal 2006-3069                                                    
                                            Application 10/661,273                                                 
                                            Technology Center 2600                                                 
                                                  __________                                                       
                                         Decided: September 27, 2007                                               
                                                   _________                                                       
                Before JOHN C. MARTIN, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and                                                     
                ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                              
                Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3-7, 9-15, and 17-22. We have jurisdiction                       
                under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We AFFIRM.                                                                







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013