Appeal 2006-3074
Application 10/035,464
in view of Nordenstam, Cory, and Munger to use a bogus message timer.
Accordingly, we cannot sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 18 and
19.
ORDER
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 20 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed as to claims 1 through 4, 6 through 17, and 20,
and reversed as to claims 5, 18, and 19.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
jlb
PAUL W. MARTIN
NCR CORPORATION, LAW DEPT.
1700 S. PATTERSON BLVD.
DAYTON, OH 45479-0001
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013