Appeal No. 2006-3075 Page 5 Application No. 10/313,205 thickness on articulating surfaces of the prosthesis3 and (2) irregular surface structures adapted to accommodate tissue ingrowth on a portion of the prosthesis body.4 Hunter illustrates “[a] typical hip joint assembly” in Figure 1, wherein the femoral head 6 of the prosthesis fits into and articulates against the inner lining 8 of an acetabular cup 10. . . .” Hunter, page 6, lines 4-7. Further referencing Figure 1, Hunter teaches that “[a] porous metal bead or wire mesh coating 12 may be incorporated to allow stabilization of the implant by ingrowth of surrounding tissue into the porous coating.” Hunter, page 6, lines 7-9. Hunter provides a method for producing a low friction, wear resistant oxide coating of uniform thickness on articulating surfaces of a prosthesis. See e.g., Hunter, pages 8-10. Amrich provides a method for producing irregular surface structures on a prosthesis (e.g., an artificial hip5) adapted to accommodate tissue ingrowth on a portion of the prosthesis body. No doubt the “irregular surfaces contemplated by Hunter . . . were the conventional irregular surfaces used on prosthetic devices at the time of Hunter . . . .” Brief, page 12. This does not, however, preclude a combination wherein Hunter’s “irregular surfaces” are replaced by Amrich’s improved irregular surface structures.6 3 See, e.g., Hunter, page 5, lines 21-24; and page 10, lines 16-20. 4 See, e.g., Hunter, page 5, lines 21-24; and page 6, lines 7-10. 5 Amrich, column 1, lines 22-32. 6 The reverse is equally tenable, wherein Amrich is modified by Hunter resulting in a prosthetic metallic substrate with improved irregular surface structures for bone ingrowth and oxidized regions where the prosthetic articulates.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013